Op-Ed by Jim Warren. Despite a propaganda offensive depicting nuclear power as carbon free and safer than ever, resuscitating the failed technology would be a huge, unnecessary gamble for our climate, economy and safety.
Articles & News Releases
Jump to a Category
Serious Problems with Energy Bill S3 – Statement from NC WARN
NC Needs Clean, Economical Energy – Not a Consumer & Public Health Rip-off Energy bill has fatal flaws: Fix it or nix it Despite the efforts of many dedicated people to address concerns with Senate Bill 3, more problems have emerged after continuing scrutiny. The electric utilities have laden this …
GAO to Study N-Plant Fire Reg Enforcement per Rep. Price – News Release by NC WARN
NC WARN: Waste Awareness & Reduction Network PRESS STATEMENT July 11, 2007 Contact: Jim Warren 919-416-5077 GAO Will Study Enforcement of Nuclear Plant Fire Regulations Statement from NC WARN Executive Director Jim Warren: Today, Congressman David Price announced that the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has accepted his request to study …
Nuclear = the Worst Managerial Disaster — Forbes
$20 Billion Dollar Check to Utilities – Announcement from NC WARN
Progress’ Nuke Delay Is Boost for Climate Protection – Statement from NC WARN
NOTE TO EDITORS Contact: Jim Warren June 6, 2007 A Big Boost Against Global Warming and Nuclear Risks Progress Energy’s delay in pursuing new reactors is an important step toward climate protection and the transition to clean, economical electricity Statement by Jim Warren, Executive Director of NC WARN: Many …
“No Meltdown Yet” – NC WARN Report on Harris Problems
Update on Harris Fire Violations – Endless Delay – Fact Sheet by NC WARN
Fire Violations: Groups’ Response to NRC Proposed Ruling
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION J.E. Dyer, Director In the Matter of Docket No. 50-400 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY – License No. NPF-63 Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit ______________________________________________________________________________ PETITIONERS’ RESPONSE TO PROPOSED DIRECTOR’S DECISION UNDER 10 C.F.R. 2.206 NOW COME …