NC WARN, has accused Duke Energy of “gross incompetence” or “corporate fraud.” The environmental justice group claims the nation’s largest utility company deliberately tried to defraud North Carolinians by submitting a rate hike proposal with expenses including corporate jet travel and political contributions.
Duke Energy & State Regulators
NC WARN regularly challenges Duke Energy to make a rapid transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy and energy efficiency. We intervene at the NC Utilities Commission in cases involving Duke’s rate increases and 15-year Integrated Resource Plans (IRPs). And we have repeatedly reached out directly to the corporation’s executives, seeking to collaborate with them on finding ways to avert climate catastrophe. A few examples are listed here.
Related:
- Check out the new coalition: Energy Justice NC: End the Duke Monopoly
- Duke Energy page on Energy & Policy Institute website
Jump to a Subcategory
All News Categories
Four agendas at play in Duke Energy’s NC rate hearing — Charlotte Business Journal
The principal players battling over Duke Energy Carolinas’ proposed 5.1% rate hike had significantly different ideas about what this week’s hearing before the N.C. Utilities Commission was about. For Duke, the hearing was about $3.8 billion in new costs it must cover. For the commission’s public staff, it was about the how the agency’s proposed rate settlement balances Duke’s needs with those of customers. For the N.C. attorney general’s office, the hearing was about what return on equity Duke will be allowed and whether customers can afford it. For watchdog group NC WARN, it was about whether Duke can be trusted to honestly report costs and whether regulators will police the utility.
Duke Energy defends rate charges, settlement — Charlotte Observer
Duke Energy witnesses defend propriety of most customer charges — Charlotte Business Journal
Duke Energy witnesses testifying in the company’s rate hearing before the N.C. Utilities Commission on Thursday defended the company against accusations by the witness for watchdog group NC WARN that it was seeking to charge customers for more than $20 million worth of costs that should be paid by shareholders.
Duke Energy critic disputes rate charges — Charlotte Observer
NC WARN: Duke Energy should pay penalty for improper charges — Charlotte Business Journal
Duke Energy’s profit margin is questioned — Charlotte Observer
Attorney General Roy Cooper’s staff spent much of a Tuesday hearing probing the profit margin for investors built into Duke Energy Carolinas’ request for a 5.1 percent rate hike. The return on common equity, or ROE, is a critical component of the case before the North Carolina Utilities Commission. By agreeing to pare its initial 11.25 percent request to 10.2 percent, Duke gave up $112 million in new revenue. But Assistant Attorney General Margaret Force wanted to know how Duke and the commission’s Public Staff, which represents consumers, arrived at that number. The short answer: It’s complicated and, in large part, subjective.
Duke Energy faces accusations of overcharging customers — WNCN
Evidentiary hearings began Monday afternoon at the N.C. Utilities Commission, which heard evidence from supporters and opponents of Duke Energy’s proposed $200 million rate increase. Questioning in day two of the hearing has primarily focused on how much money Duke Energy Carolinas will earn with the company’s proposed return on equity, a measure of profit.
As regulators hear Duke rate case, advocacy groups cite corporate greed — News & Observer
By John Murawski Advocacy groups made their last-minute public appeal Monday to block Duke Energy’s third rate increase request in the past four years, as rate hearings got underway in Raleigh before the N.C. Utilities Commission. NC WARN, AARP, Greenpeace and others staged a rally outside the state office building …
Duke cites errors in rate filing — Charlotte Observer
By Bruce Henderson RALEIGH — Duke Energy’s North Carolina president on Monday acknowledged the company made errors in charges that it tried to pass on to customers, including $326,000 in political contributions. Paul Newton was the first witness Monday in a hearing in Duke’s rate case before the North Carolina …